SKU: 34536956122

Skinuva Scar Cream (0.5 oz) + Skinuva Brite (1 oz)

$112.50 $125.00
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on farma-dretovice.cz >

Pay in installments of $31.25 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 24 - Jul 29

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Skinuva Scar Cream (0.5 oz) + Skinuva Brite (1 oz)Skinuva Scar is a physician designed and clinically tested scar cream that uses highly selective growth factors within a silicone cream matrix to help improve the appearance of scars. Skinuva's rigorous clinical studies have shown that Skinuva Scar improves the appearance of scars nearly two times better when compared to silicone cream. The 15 mL 0. 5 oz Skinuva Scar is ideal for smaller scars less than 1 inch in size; such as scars from small

Skinuva Scar is a physician designed and clinically tested scar cream that uses highly selective growth factors within a silicone cream matrix to help improve the appearance of scars. Skinuva's rigorous clinical studies have shown that Skinuva Scar improves the appearance of scars nearly two-times better when compared to silicone cream.

The 15 mL / 0.5 oz Skinuva Scar is ideal for smaller scars less than 1 inch in size; such as scars from small biopsies, Mohs/skin cancer, arthroscopic incisions, or laparoscopic incisions.

Skinuva Brite is one of the few safe and effective hyperpigmentation products on the market that does not contain hydroquinone. Skinuva’s team of doctors and scientists were able to integrate selective ingredients to create what is now regarded as one of the most advanced topical creams for hyperpigmentation. In clinical studies, Skinuva Brite was nearly 30% more effective in improving hyperpigmentation than HQ4%.

Use in Combination 

While Skinuva Scar and its ingredients have been clinically proven to help reduce the appearance of scars, Skinuva Brite can also help improve the appearance of hyperpigmentation. Depending on the procedure, both products can be suitable in your pre and post treatment recovery procedure.

Long Term Scar Treatment: Skinuva Scar is best used after your surgery, laser resurfacing, or even microneedling. For treating a recent scar (cosmetic and non-cosmetic surgery). If after this use of Skinuva Scar for 3-6 months, there is the appearance of residual hyperpigmentation associated with the scar, Skinuva Brite may also be used and can be helpful to further improve the hyperpigmentation at that time.

Post Laser, Chemical Peel, Microneedling: Skinuva Scar and Skinuva Brite can help in different stages of your laser resurfacing treatment, chemical peel, or microneedling treatment. Skinuva Brite can be helpful in improving the appearance of hyperpigmentation such as dark spots, discoloration of the face and body, and it can be used prior to your laser, chemical peel, or microneedling treatments help optimize and maintain the even appearance of your skin.


Ingredients

Skinuva Scar: Water/Aqua/Eau, Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice, Glycerin, Dimethicone, Cyclopentasiloxane, Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Hydroxyethyl Acrylate/Sodium Acryloyldimethyl Taurate Copolymer, Tetrahexyldecyl Ascorbate, PPG-12/SMDI Copolymer, Ethoxydiglycol, Sodium Hyaluronate, Centella Asiatica Extract, sh-Polypeptide-5, sh-Oligopeptide- 1, sh-Polypeptide- 1, Phenoxyethanol, Ethylhexylglycerin.

Skinuva Brite: Water (Aqua), Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Isononyl Isononanoate, C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate, Niacinamide, Arbutin, Tranexamic Acid, Silica, Tetrahexyldecyl Ascorbate, Cetearyl Alcohol, Glyceryl Stearate, PEG-100 Stearate, Ceteareth-20, Polysorbate 60, Hydroxyethyl Acrylate/Sodium Acryloyldimethyl Taurate Copolymer, Xylitylglucoside, Anhydroxylitol, Xylitol, Phenoxyethanol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Titanium Dioxide, Citric Acid, rh-polypeptide-22, sh-oligopeptide-1, Citrus Aurantium Bergamia (Bergamot) Fruit Oil, Citrus Grandis (Grapefruit) Peel Oil, Citrus Aurantium Dulcis (Orange) Peel Oil, Citrus Tangerina (Tangerine) Peel Oil

Usage Instructions

Skinuva Scar: In order to see optimal results, Skinuva is to be applied twice a day for 3-6 months.

Skinuva Brite: Make sure the affected area is clean and dry. Apply a thin film over the affected area twice a day, morning and night. Ask your physician for children under 6 months. See insert for detailed instructions.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 34536956122

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 11 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
R
Verified Purchase
Robert C.
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
An Excellent Summary Defending The Synoptic Gospels and Jesus Christ's Claims of Divinity
Format: Hardcover
This book is an excellent summary that refutes the arguments made by modern theologians and scholars of the Bible that claim that the Gospels were of anonymous authorship, written late in the 1st Century AD, and Jesus of Nazareth never claimed to be divine. Bart Ehrman's (an avowed atheist that seems motivated to denigrate Christianity) shoddy scholarship is frequently given as an example to be refuted. The author cites the Apostolic Fathers and more recent scholars to show that the claims made by the revisionists are incorrect. There are several detailed 5 Star reviews, so I won't duplicate their praises for Dr. Pitre's book. The book is a quick read and there are numerous end notes. A minor criticism is that the book lacks a bibliography, but the sources are fully identified within the end notes. The author makes a couple of very interesting observations concerning the Transfiguration of Jesus and how Jesus fulfilled Scripture (namely, the Book of Jonah) that I had not considered before. One of the negative reviews cites the notes in the New American Bible as evidence that Dr. Pitre's book is incorrect. While it is true that the Catholic Church in the U.S. uses the NAB translation in its liturgy, other Biblical scholars dispute the notes included in that edition of the Bible. A similar problem exists with the notes included with Oxford's Catholic Study Bible. The notes were written by modern revisionists. I suppose you have to decide whether to accept the words of the Apostolic Fathers (i.e., men that either were or knew the Apostles) and Jesus Christ, or if -- 2000 years later -- you're too sophisticated to accept the word of some ancient guys. The author is Catholic, and the book has been granted an Imprimatur. However, since this book does not get into the weeds concerning doctrinal differences, it should be of value to any Christian.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 15, 2024
D
Verified Purchase
Dick
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 4
Good but more academic
Format: Hardcover
I love Brant Pitre, especially his books Jesus and the Jewish Roots of the Eucharist and Jesus the Bridegroom. I would say those books should be required reading for anyone who is catechist or is involved in RCIA as Catholics. This book is good, however it is primarily an academic work where Dr. Pitre takes on the Historical Jesus movement and Dr. Bart Ehrman in particular. In this book he goes on to show that the gospels were written within a few decades of Jesus death by the disciples that have given their names to the gospels. He uses his knowledge of Jewish faith and culture to show that Jesus really does claim to be God in all the gospels, not just the Gospel of John. It is a good book but not one that I would find useful on a regular basis.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 14, 2016
R
Verified Purchase
Russell P. Hills
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
BEST BOOK IN 20 YEARS
Format: Hardcover
BEST BOOK that I have read in 20 years. This should be required reading in Christian schools. Every Christian who has graduated from high school should read this book. As one who has studied Church History, Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek myself, I had become very disappointed in what passes as scholarship, even among Ivy Leage graduates, in the 21st century. HOWEVER, Dr. Pitre's book is a great encouragement that there really are people "out-there" that display genuine scholarship. With Appreciation, Russ Hills, Ph.D.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 13, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
A
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
A Case for Jesus' Divine Self-Conception
Format: Kindle
This is a very meticulously reasoned argument attempting to show that Jesus had a Divine self-conception. That is, Jesus believed, and claimed, that he was God. Pitre begins by posing C.S. Lewis’ famous “trilemma” to the reader. If Jesus claimed to be God, we have three ways to respond – he was either a Liar, Lunatic, or Lord. Pitre’s work in this book strives to bring us back, face to face, with this trilemma. To accomplish this, Pitre needs to defeat another popular notion in the modern mind – that Jesus, or at least much of the Gospel material about him, was a “Legend.” If Pitre can show that Jesus did, in fact, historically claim Divinity, we will be forced to respond to his claim and answer Jesus’ own question for ourselves – “Who do you say that I am?” To accomplish this Pitre first attempts to show that the Gospels are historically reliable. He believes that, contrary to modern scholarly opinion, the Gospels were indeed written by the authors they have been attributed to (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), that they were intended to portray historically accurate biographical pictures of Jesus, and that they were written much more closely to the time of Jesus than liberal scholars assume (Pitre tentatively dates the synoptic Gospels all before the destruction of the Temple in AD 70). These three pieces of evidence – authorship, intent, and dating – all lead Pitre to the conclusion that the Gospels give us historically accurate information about Jesus. After setting the stage by arguing for the accuracy of our sources, Pitre delves into the synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) and tries to show that although it is not always explicit (i.e. Jesus doesn’t say “I am God, worship Me.”) even the synoptics portray Jesus as claiming Divinity. Using evidence such as Jesus’ use of the titles “Son of Man” and “I Am,” prophesy from the book of Daniel, Jesus’ “stilling of the storm,” the transfiguration, the pronouncement of the forgiveness of the parlytic’s sins, the riddle about the Son of David being David’s “Lord,”, the crucifixion, and the resurrection, Pitre makes his case. In the end, he believes that not only do the Gospel authors portray Jesus as Divine, but that these claims came from Jesus himself. Thus we are led, full circle, back to the trilemma. We can call Jesus Liar, Lunatic, or Lord, but not, according to Pitre, a Legend. This was a really interesting read from a conservative scholar. His exegesis of many Gospel passages illuminate how the Hebrew Scriptures provide a much needed backdrop for understanding each story. The Gospels are much more nuanced than we might first think and oftentimes one saying or image may evoke whole passages or concepts from the Old Testament that would have been apparent to early Jewish readers. As Pitre argues, understanding the Jewish context of the synoptic authors helps in understanding their Christology. In the end, I agree with Pitre that the Gospels are generally more historically accurate than “mainstream” scholars give them credit for. I think it’s plausible that the Gospel titles reveal their true authors and that they were written fairly early after Jesus’ death (before the fall of Jerusalem). I also agree that the Synoptics may implicitly ascribe Divinity to Jesus – although I don’t think that is an open and shut case. If there were more explicit cases in the synoptic Gospels where Jesus claimed Divinity, it would help his case. It still seems to me the only explicit sayings we have come from the Gospel of John, which even Pitre doesn’t seem to argue is historically reliable (at least he doesn’t focus on this in the book). It’s probably outside the scope of this book, but I would have loved to see Pitre address the idea of Jesus as Apocalyptic Prophet. He interacts with several scholars who accept this notion (EP Sanders, Dale Allison, Bart Ehrman, John Meier) and it’s a viable option in the world of Historical Jesus scholarship. I think it’s a relevant topic in all discussions surrounding a Historical Jesus and can be a large factor in how one answers the question of Jesus’ identity. This study is worth reading regardless of your theological persuasion, and Pitre’s arguments deserve serious consideration.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2016
S
Verified Purchase
ShopWeez
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
Relief for dry mouth without gum irritation
Big improvement for users with sensitive gums. These relieve dry mouth during the night almost as well as the regular tabs. Some complained about a residual gel left on the gums. 🙄Just wipe it off. It’s a small thing.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2026

recommand products

Stud Dangle Earrings in Light Turquoise / Textured Silver
114.00
Sea Mist
59.95
Bowl with Three Fish
169.95
Nave's Topical Bible Orville J Naive 1974 Moody Press Hardcover Red Revised
27.36
Eduardo Alfieri Mandolinate Sotto Le Stelle 33 RPM LP Record Fiesta 1973
12.95